https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40270

--- Comment #19 from [email protected] 2012-10-18 02:32:50 UTC ---
To all: 
There is ongoing discussion on [[ja:WP:VP/AutoConfirmCount10]] because an
objection was raised on 10/15 (after closure of vote and formal objection
period) from 218.42.27.236. The user proposes that there should be another
voting process only among admins, which would pass with a over-majority support
of all registered administrators (60 admins in jawiki; therefore 31 admins),
and unless that is met, this proposal should be taken down. 

In my personal view, not only does this goes against what adminship is all
about, but also is really ex post facto, but I'll let you know if the
discussion at jawiki reaches anywhere.


To Tanuki:
Of course there is no permanent page for this proposal. This is a one-time
issue, unlike RfA which happens every once in a while.

The number of admins who participated in the poll is not relevant. Only a
community consensus is required. [[ja:WP:NOBIGDEAL]] explicitly states that an
administrator's opinion does not take precedence over that of a normal user.

The name of the page "Idobata" has nothing to do with the effectiveness of the
process, as I have stated above. The expression "idobata kaigi" (chatting
beside the well) does not make it any different.

Maybe we should take this discussion back to [[ja:WP:VP/AutoConfirmCount10]?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to