https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19382





--- Comment #3 from Laurence 'GreenReaper' Parry <[email protected]>  
2009-06-24 22:39:42 UTC ---
I care more about the fact that the bytes have to be transferred to the client
than that Wikimedia has to serve them. This is aimed at improving site
responsiveness for users, not cutting bandwidth usage. Every byte you cut out
of the head (or the head scripts) is a byte that does not have to be downloaded
and processed before the browser can start displaying the page.

No, this change would not make a huge difference by itself. Nor is removing
comments like "<!-- Head scripts -->" or "<!-- end of the left (by default at
least) column -->". But if we can save 1kb with 20 such changes, that *does*
mean a faster page, especially for those on mobile devices or limited
connections. And a faster site is one which people are more likely to edit.

Wikimedia has spent a lot of time on improving server responsiveness. As those
problems become less of an issue, we need to look at the gains that can be made
on the front-end. All the cool sites are doing it:
http://royal.pingdom.com/2008/07/08/best-website-performance-tips-from-velocity-2008/
- http://code.google.com/speed/

Brion rightly points out in IRC that perhaps removing the "var" would provide
even more gains. How about removing tabs and also the vars, while retaining the
newlines?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to