https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41555
--- Comment #12 from Krinkle <[email protected]> 2012-10-30 21:13:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > Many of the special pages already contain purely technical - or even > > internal - > > data not really intended for readers, but only tech-savvy editors, e.g. > > Special:MostLinked, Special:UnwatchedPages, Special:MostRevisions... I think > > there is a clear distiction between them and regular pages. > > MostLinked, UnwatchedPages, MostRevisions, Recentchanges, etc... all of these > other generic special pages are about the site and it's content not meta > information on MediaWiki. > +1 > Version was generic. But what else is version going to be about than the > software. The word itself was very meta so it didn't have the issue. > > But "About". That just screams "About the wiki" "About the site"... That name > just screams "I wrote an extension that presents the site's about inside of a > special page" like someone might write a Special:Contact extension. I always liked the Dutch translation of Special:Version: Speciaal:Softwareversie ("Software version"). What about Special:SofwareInfo. (In reply to comment #11) > Keep it as Special:Version No good rationale for the renaming, but there are > several reasons for not doing it. This comment is useless without details. There are various comments here, on other bugs and on the mailing list that provide rationale for renaming, denying that with no details is just foolish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
