https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41451
--- Comment #36 from Siebrand <s.mazel...@xs4all.nl> 2012-11-09 12:51:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > Going by what I heard from Mark, Tim Starling and others, the situation seems > to be like this: > > * Bypassing Squids would make it work, but opens a DoS vector. Mark does *not* > like it. > * there are probably ways to do this with the new Varnish caches. > * Migration to Varnish is at least 6 months away. I'm confused. See below. (In reply to comment #21) > Aren't we using Varnish already? Snippet from wikidata.org: > Server:Apache > Vary:Accept-Encoding > Via:1.1 varnish > Via:1.1 varnish > X-Varnish:1326947601 > X-Varnish:3373410970 > X-Vary-Options:Accept-Encoding;list-contains=gzip This remained unanswered. So I'm asking again: Aren't we using Varnish already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
