https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35534
--- Comment #12 from Nemo <[email protected]> 2012-11-24 21:15:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Please elaborate when doing such changes. > > Well, you started with setting "high priority" without explaining. ;) Yes, I assumed knowledge of past discussions because there are too many of them on the topic to even link them (and not all public or known to me either), e.g. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/61378 > Comment 5 states that noone plans to spend time on fixing this in Wikimedia > but > that we wait for upstream. And that makes it defacto "lowest priority". Plus > upstream report is still open. As I said, «as soon as possible (ie as soon as upstream moves on it)». When it's is available in gerrit, this has to be implemented immediately, so it's of high/highest priority although delayed; I've no idea how to mark it otherwise, not having LATER; "upstream" marks it as waiting anyway. Besides, RobLa didn't completely rule out the possibility of WMF fixing the bug upstream as well in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
