https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40124
--- Comment #22 from Krinkle <[email protected]> 2012-12-03 21:55:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #18) > > So what about the use case mentioned in comment 0? That is valid indeed and > > has > > been filed as bug 21897. In fact implementation has already began in > > Salvatore > > Ingala's branch of the Gadgets extension. It implements a small dedicated > > key/value storage for gadgets that want it. It has value type validation and > > will provide them in-context. > > Oh, will we finally be able to make non-centrally-managed "gadgets" now, > taking > advantage of this feature? Or have some way to not have to wade through a > gadgets list 200 pages long if all user scripts are converted to gadgets? If > not, this is not particularly helpful. Gadget preferences have little to do with user gadgets. User gadgets: No, converting a user script to a "User gadget" (with the model I have in mind of Gadgets 3.0) will not add anything to Special:Preferences. It will add it to a user-level repository. You can search trough repositories you have "linked" (e.g. the site-wide repo and any users you have linked. Not a list but a search interface) Gadget preferences: No, these preferences would be on a per-gadget level. They wouldn't pollute the main Special:Preferences panel (the UI isn't final yet, but afaik Salvatore's proposal was a modal dialog triggered from an icon next to the gadget name on Special:Preferences) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
