https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
--- Comment #4 from Legoktm <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > We can definitely hide the data when the article has been deleted, as was > done in this case. What was hidden in this case? I'm pretty sure I can see everything. > We store the article title in the AbuseFilter log, so we can > check if it's been deleted. > > However, if a public rule is triggered for a particular revision that later > is > deleted, AbuseFilter doesn't keep around enough information to prevent > showing > this. I'm not following you. Can't it just check if the title exists and choose to show the detailed information based on that? > A workaround is to restrict the abusefilter-log-detail permission. By > default, > it's given to *. I'm not sure if restricting abusefilter-log-detail is the right solution. There are non-sysops who have the abusefilter-modify right through the EFM group who technically shouldn't be able to see deleted content, but would still be able to. And if we're still tracking harmless things like WikiLove ([[Special:AbuseFilter/423]]) in the EF, it makes no sense to hide that from typical users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
