https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9497
Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|Normal |High See Also| |https://bugzilla.wikimedia. | |org/show_bug.cgi?id=28135 Severity|normal |major --- Comment #41 from Sumana Harihareswara <[email protected]> --- Nemo, can you explain how you figured out how many files are affected? That will affect how highly we should prioritize this bug. (In reply to comment #3) > I suggest we change [[MediaWiki:Thumbnail invalid params]] to "Invalid > thumbnail parameters or non-JPG file with more than 12.5 million pixels" > until > a more memory efficient solution for rendering larger images has been found. On en.wp, the message is "Invalid thumbnail parameters or image file with more than 12.5 million pixels", and on Commons it is now "Invalid thumbnail parameters or PNG file with more than 25 million pixels". So we probably don't need to change the message in MessagesEn.php directly. :) I've updated https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VipsScaler and bug 28135 (the review-and-deploy-VipsScaler issue); honestly, it sounds to me like people should consider moving forward with a non-VipsScaler solution in the short term to fix this particular bug. Does the patch in attachment 8978 in comment #21 still work? (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > Note that it should be possible to deploy this without any patch at all, > > just > > by configuring the WMF servers correctly (at least according to Bawolff > > [comment #25] - I > > believe them). We might want to test configure it on the test wiki first. > > Where > > is the right place to look for someone to do that? > > I don't know that much about procedures involving wmf server software > deployment, but I imagine git://github.com/dcoetzee/pngscale.git would have > to > be reviewed first, and I imagine that it would take roughly the same amount > of > effort to review that than to review the VIPS thing. (These are just guesses > though. I really don't know what I'm talking about in this area) We're trying to update the documentation around WMF server software deployment changes -- see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Writing_an_extension_for_deployment and https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers#Operations.2Fsystems_administration . If you just need to figure out who to ask or how to move forward on a request, the #wikimedia-operations and #wikimedia-tech channels have a rotation of which Operations person is "on RT duty" -- http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/Interrupts_Rotation has more information and a listing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
