https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8697

--- Comment #14 from Nemo <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I thought about implementing this but I'm struggling a bit...
> Is there any reason at all to have older RC entries unpatrolled while newer
> ones are already patrolled?

Yes but only if one nitpicks a lot: strictly speaking you've not reviewed all
edits but only a collation of them, however if you are looking at that specific
multi-revisions diff it probably means it's a single edit in multiple steps
(which can be patrolled only if from same author and with rollback), or some
other sort of related diffs you're checking together and acting upon as a
consequence (if you come from enhanced RC, they must be in the same solar day).

> Do we need a log entry for every revision that is patrolled? (This could
> flood
> the logs a LOT).

I don't think it would flood logs a lot, because it's merely what we're already
doing now (especially with AJAX patrolling), just with less clicks. And patrol
log entries are hidden by default.
Either way, it doesn't matter much IMHO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to