https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2085
--- Comment #20 from Mormegil <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #18) > I'm sorry but per comment 14 this is considered a lowest priority bug and > nobody is working on it; don't mislead users. Note that the comment was made before the time every page on Commons used the {{int:lang}} hack. After that, and especially after bug 14404 was fixed, I don’t see the reason why the {{int:lang}} hack shouldn’t be implemented properly instead of abusing a different construction. The cache coherence issues should have been resolved by bug 14404, AFAICS. So, there is no need why this should be a WONTFIX. (See also http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-January/057763.html (corrected link from comment #15).) As for “nobody is working on it”: this is not difficult to implement, programming-wise. Just to make sure it gets accepted to core. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
