https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38095
--- Comment #14 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <[email protected]> --- As a compromise could we include: *The exception description (aka "foo" part of throw new MWException( 'foo' ) ) *A backtrace without the arguments included (just function names). I can't imagine there would be sensitive information in that. (In reply to comment #12) > With regards to Nemo's point, the current message is completely useless. If > there's something sensitive in it, it makes sense not to display what caused > it. But at least include a "you can report this error at xxx" notice! [offtopic] I also miss the "Please enable $wgShowExceptionDetails" part being actual text instead of an html comment. There's a lot more errors from third parties not sure what to do about the error then there used to be. It'd be nice if (not on wikimedia) that was back to not being a comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
