https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44465
--- Comment #3 from Kelson [Emmanuel Engelhart] <[email protected]> --- @Erik * We need a simple Mediawiki with nothing special, no custom extension. * About HTTPS, if the WMF needs absolutely a valid certificate, I can have a look to this problem. * About mobile support, not sure to understand what is exactly the problem with the openZIM Mediawiki. Do we have to tweak the wiki code? * openZIM has always been since its creation sponsored and leaded by WMCH members and I see no reason to change that in a near future. * There is no license problem, the wiki was edited by only a few people who are agree to switch to CC. I think it would be good to have this wiki at the WMF because: * Situation would be clear: bugzilla, Git and Website are hosted in the same place * For you this is a new line in a maintenance script, for us this is a real work to keep such a website running. openZIM has been until now a Wikimedia driven project, although it's true it's not a WMF one. This is not a new project, this is a project which has already proven to offer an added value. For these reasons I'm a little bit surprised to read something like the paragraph 2 in your message. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
