https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
--- Comment #13 from Marius Hoch <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > Would it be common for a page that needs to be deleted and suppress to be > moved > around first, so that we can't match the page's title in the abusefilter > logs? No > Again, if we're talking about a single revision for a page (excluding the > very > first revision when the page is created), suppressing the revision will also > suppress the AbuseFilter logs automatically. So this is only when the initial > edit needs to be suppressed (since AF logs it without a revision_id, since no > revision exists at the time that we're filtering), or the page title needs > suppression. > > How about inserting a link on the delete confirmation page (using the hook), > that links to the abuse filter logs for that page, if any abusefilter logs > exist for that title and the user has suppression rights? That would let > someone who is suppressing data know that they need to also check the logs > and > see if any entries need suppression as well. But the interface would remain > unchanged for most users. That would come with a different flavor of the problem I mentioned above: Only oversighters can hide and unhide log entries (at least on WMF wikis) as we only have one hidden level. If I recall it right it's not trivial to introduce more than one... I thought about this bug (and even hacked up some stuff) in December and wasn't able to come up with a perfect solution (see above) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
