https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45538
--- Comment #8 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #7) > We'll discuss all this with our product team, review the Gerrit changes and > post back here shortly with a release plan for both features. Sounds good. You may want to post on the RFC talk page to catch the attention of any lingering talk page watchers with any updates. > I support Oliver's reasonable suggestion to wait a few days, to make sure > that we are all clear on the final consensus, as well as prepare for the many > steps that would go along with either an opt-in version or removal of AFT5. Sure, there's no real rush. I'll make a note to check back in a week. (In reply to comment #6) > I'd imagine we should wait at least a couple of days to see if there's any > fallout from the close. Picking a middle-ground that few parties signed up to > directly is a largely novel way of defining and deciding consensus; I'd be > more comfortable making sure that there's no fallout before taking action. Sure, as above. Though the worst case I can imagine here is that a few people might get upset about AFTv5 switching back to opt-in rather than being completely disabled. I guess? I can't really see the outrage, to be honest. In the case of immediately deploying <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/51341>, the local community can still decide to simply not use the category (that is, not opt-in to article feedback on any articles). As long as nobody tries to mass-add this category to articles with a bot and without consensus again, I doubt there'd be any issue. ;-) But waiting a few days is fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
