https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45574
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > I seem to remember some rule like "extensions can set CSS/JS at the top, but > gadgets and user scripts can't" or something. Is that right? Could this just > be > ported to a MediaWiki extension? > > The English Wiktionarians are wary of MediaWiki extensions as the past > process > for getting them reviewed and deployed has been pretty awful for them (and > many > other projects). But I think our processes in this area have improved > dramatically recently, so this seems like a viable option. > > Please tell me to shut up if I'm wrong about any of this. :-) Yes, extensions have control over top/bottom, and it defaults to bottom. (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgResourceModules). So that is another possible work-around. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I seem to remember some rule like "extensions can set CSS/JS at the top, but > > gadgets and user scripts can't" or something. Is that right? Could this just > > be > > ported to a MediaWiki extension? > Yes and yes (though I didn't really take a look at the code)... > I don't see why position=top couldn't be implemented in the gadget extension > though (performance issues maybe?) I believe they will be in the Gadgets 2.0 branch. They just don't want to do a special-case before the branch is done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
