https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45627
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] --- Something like this? https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/51976/ Note that the revision stuff does not work, its just in there to show a codeflow. The item id stuff works. In a client it seems like the page (article in wikipedia) either uses one revision everywhere, or either the sitelinks or the statements use a newer revision than the opposite. That mean we could list the revision for each block that might get out of sync with the rest. I'm not sure how we can handle a page consisting of blocks from several revisions.. But in theory parts should be kept if they are not changed, so the last known revision should be good enough. There is a revision id in the change propagation, we could use that instead of trying to request it from the repo. In some newer changesets we keep the iten id for later, we could do the same for the items revision id. Unless anything triggers a rebuild of the page it can be assumed to use the same revision, and if only parts of the page changes the other parts would be the same anyhow. Yes that could work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
