https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30401

Nemo <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
            Summary|Create option to disable    |Create option to disable
                   |interface animations        |interface animations; or,
                   |                            |remove fade-out animations
                   |                            |on roll-up hide/shows, e.g.
                   |                            |in RC/WL

--- Comment #35 from Nemo <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> Note -- as a general rule, animations are nice when they work.
> 
> Fade-out animations on roll-up hide/shows such as on enhanced watchlist and
> hidable tables **are not an appropriate animation** to have in the first
> place,
> and this particular animation should not be used in that particular area.
> Those
> should be removed, independently of whether or not they are slow or people
> like
> them. (An appropriate animation here would be a roll-up or roll-down.)

Changing the summary per Brion. Do we have a list of inappropriate animations
to be killed? Should it be a separate bug?

> Where useful and desirable animations that remain are slow on slower
> machines,
> we should see about making sure those fall back to much more graceful
> behavior.
> 
> I don't think there's a general need for a "no animations" switch, as long as
> the behavior is sane to begin with

I suppose this bug can be closed (and the original request for another
preference considered rejected/addressed) when the behaviour is sane, then.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to