https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23326

--- Comment #15 from Andre Klapper <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Andre, did you read the comments? In comment 12, Marco replaced
> the original PDF with a modified PDF.

That's why I tested with the old PDF.

> That doesn't remove this bug

This report covers a few things. One is the problem that sometimes thumbnails
are not created for PDF files that Ghostscript considers to be invalid.

If this report is about the aspect "Provide some error message in the browser"
then it is not fixed, indeed, but I consider this aspect ("Expose readable
error messages in the browser" to be covered in bug 23831 already.

> The original PDF still displays
> properly in other software, so it is not broken.

So far the issue was the missing thumbnail, not how the PDF itself displays in
other software. Ghostscript says the PDF file is broken and we use Ghostscript.
I can imagine that other software is more forgiving.
If you know that the PDF file is not broken and hence consider the error
message in GhostScript wrong or misleading it would be best to discuss this
with the GhostScript developers. See the link in comment 13.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to