https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46086

--- Comment #7 from Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia <[email protected]> 
---
(In reply to comment #6)
WHOLE POST IS OFF TOPIC:
No, this means doing their work avoiding
***internal***-API-database-query-errors or at least having them automatically
notified when an ***internal*** error occurs. I am not requesting a feature or
so; this is standard in other WCMSs.

Also it would be kind if you would carefully read the full text, I posted: The
bug reporter would have a much easier job if some kind of tool would allow
collecting and transmitting all these boring technical information.

I am sure you are convinced that you run a super service. During the past 3
years things got better but they are still not the way I expect and you should
be happy in some way that you still get bug reports at all; if you don't want
any feedback than close bugzilla for non-stuff members.

When people notify me about errors with my scripts at Commons, I usually don't
ask for full information but try to find what I need myself. _I understand it
as part of my work, fetching the info I need. And if I can't get it, I have to
improve my error-info-collectors so I get the info next time the error occurs._
----

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to