https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20158
--- Comment #3 from Svip <[email protected]> 2009-08-10 15:25:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I am also not a fan of using "view > > history" rather than "history", the tabs are big enough as it is. That > > means, > > on low resolution screens, these tabs will overlap. > > I'm assuming this was the reason some of the tabs were moved to a submenu. > Personally I prefer the smaller tabs, but if usability studies have shown they > should be larger, that's fine. Hiding things that aren't used often like > 'move', 'delete', 'protect' and so forth is a good idea, but only > administrators really have enough tabs for the benefit to be noticeable, and I > do think hiding 'hew section' is a step backwards w.r.t usability. > I am not against the submenu per say, it is just that, even with the few amount of tabs, it can on low resolutions (obviously, we are talking very low (e.g. 800x600)) clutter up. Which... doesn't look nice. I realise "view history" makes more sense than just "history", but if you really want people to stop confusing it with history related to the subject at hand, I'd recommend "revisions" instead. As far as 'new section' goes, it should be outside of the menu, as the menu is (or should be) primarily for administrative tasks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
