https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36064
--- Comment #12 from Andre Klapper <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #11) > Just to clarify: NEEDINFO status/needinfo flag doesn't mean "WE SPECIFICALLY > NEED MORE INFO FROM *YOU*." Correct, but the addressee can be expressed in an additional comment. Setting NEEDINFO without a comment would be cryptic and not recommended anyway. > for example: Perhaps information may be needed from the reporter of such an > issue. But it may also wait for an answer from the JavaScript team (if such > exists). Or from the legal department. Or from the FSF. Etc. Sure, you'd need guidelines. In most Bugzillas I've been active in the rule was to use a NEEDINFO status *only* against the reporter. If you wait for an answer from the JS team, you could assign the report to the JS team. > So you need to be able to specify any other Bugzilla user as the blocker, and > each Bugzilla user must be able to query "all issues where I'm (my department > is) listed as blocker". Is the latter possible in the needinfo flag extension which is enabled on bugzilla.mozilla.org? I don't think so, and I don't plan to work on extending the functionality of that extension. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
