https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28633
--- Comment #21 from Trijnstel <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #17) > > The user attempted to save the page at 13:02:56, and received a warning. > > Then > > s/he clicked "save" again, and saved successfully at 13:03:20. > > > > Because the first edit attempt was rejected with a warning, it was not > > associated with a revision, so deleting the revision which was subsequently > > created had no effect. I'm not sure what the best solution here is, maybe > > just a bulk suppression UI. > > This is a mess of an issue. :-( > > Perhaps we could automatically add a note on action=revisiondelete saying > that > there are AbuseFilter entries for a page of this title not associated with > any > particular revision, and asking the user to check to make sure they don't > need > to suppress these too? Somewhat succinctly (albeit not hugely accurately), > "there are possible matching AbuseFilter entries for this page title"? I agree, that's a possibility. But, abusefilter logs can only be hidden by oversighters and as nlwiki doesn't have local OS no one can hide the entries apart from the stewards (and most of the local users do not even know you *can* hide those). That's why it would be nice if they would be automatically be hidden (even a revdel system for the logs perhaps?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
