https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46440
--- Comment #7 from Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #4) > But why would that many people be commenting on the same thing? Think of a controversial article that asserted a true, verifiable, but controversial fact. It would probably perennially attract comments to the sentence stating the fact. So at the very least there would have to be easy filtering/mark as resolved/mark as rejected. I agree it doesn't *have* to be Wikipedia-scalable, but it's certainly far more useful if it is. Note, implementers should also consider looking at the co-ment code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
