https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #8) > please close I thought it was. > can't calculate the info for the thumbnail without > actually resizing it When images are used in the usual UI, it's beneficial to know whether resizing works (or OOM occurs, it's over the max-size), ... but if this information is not forwarded to the API, there is no reason to scale all files. Also I doubt all were scaled because these queries usually took (and take) less than 1 s to complete while when requesting URIs of unusual image sizes, the server usually takes at least 1 s to respond per file. And I thought files are scaled on dedicated "image scalers"... so you really send requests out to these scalers and wait for them to complete and then send out the API response? Either I am under a misconception or this sounds really dubious... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
