https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26720
--- Comment #10 from Chad H. <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > What are we actually talking about validating for? > I'm new to MediaWiki development and I was going to start on fixing this, but > I'm not clear as to the issue at hand. The steps described ('#' case) no > longer > pass validation because the generated empty-string namespace gets rejected, > but > whether this means the bug was fixed in passing is not clear to me because > I'm > not sure what the actual bug is/was. Part of my confusion is also that I find > the notion that '#' would be a uniquely problematic name suspect--Shouldn't > it > be something more like names beginning with '#'? But unless the site name > gets > used in db table names, I couldn't find any usage of # that seemed like it > would make this a problem either way. > > If it's not worth the trouble clarifying this for a newbie, no problem, but I > think in that case the 'easy' keyword might be better removed. I think the original main problem (of conflicting namespace names) was the worse problem, which I fixed a long time ago. I really don't think anything else needs fixing here at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
