https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46689
--- Comment #19 from Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> --- (In reply to comment #16) > @Nemo: In the case that JarJar vandalizes Kirk's userpage, and BuckRogers > reverts JarJar, should Kirk receive one notification about the rollback or > none > at all? Ideally none (there's watchlist for that), or only one notification (about the rollback) as with the new user message bar. (In reply to comment #18) > Attempting to address this would take significant work and depending on the > exact timing and user settings its behaviour could be very mysterious to > users. I quite disagree on this, because Special:Notifications shows messages that don't actually exist (they've been removed from your talk page, possibly even deleted or suppressed?): this seems way more confusing and mysterious to me, and it's a regression. Of course I can't help finding an implementation, but I wouldn't think the underlying database so important: the notifications special page and flyout should just check if the message actually exists before showing it, independently from its presence in whatever table. For this bug, in most cases it will be enough to check that rev_sha1 is not the same after JarJar's edit as it was before it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
