https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20337
--- Comment #8 from Casey Brown <[email protected]> 2009-08-24 23:26:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo indicates that only one other > oversight-related list exists (Oversight-request-fiwiki-l). There are others, they're just hiding. ;-) We have: oversight-l (should be specified to enwp, but it's old), oversight-wp-de, and oversight-es. There may be more, but google translate is blocked on the computer I'm on... apparently it's a "Domain with Translation/Redirect Contents!" He's right that it's really best to have mailing lists for oversight... that way requests are archived and others can comment on them, also speeds up the oversight process. > simple.wikipedia is a relatively small wiki; > none of the big wikis have their own oversight-l list.... Depends what you qualify as "the big wikis". enwiki (oversight-l), dewiki (oversight-wp-de), and eswiki (oversight-es) all have them. ja/pl/it/pt/nl don't have oversights, but frwp has select stewards as their oversights -- this is why these ones don't have lists. Now whether or not simple actually needs *oversighters* is another story. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
