https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43966
--- Comment #2 from Aaron Schulz <[email protected]> --- Since the top X (1 in this case) edits where reverted, it's equivalent to reverting to the previous revision. Since that revision was not reviewed, the new edit was treated as needing review (since it was treated as "based off" that unreviewed revision). I think it could be changed so that using ?undo= always treats the "base" as the current. It could decouple the "equivalent" revision as another concept. That way, if either the base or equivalent revision is reviewed, the new edit can be reviewed. This can be done with an extra hidden input on the edit form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
