https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45036
--- Comment #7 from Isarra <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Are there examples of browsers/apps that cannot scale down a 32px favicon as > > needed? > > None that I know of... however it's sometimes good to do some pixel-level > adjusting, or manual sharpening, on the 16x16 version. Indeed - ones like meta certainly need that (or at least a specific render) or they get all fuzzy-like, but more basic ones probably don't. I couldn't really tell the difference with wikimania's and wikivoyage's, for instance, which included testing on broken, crappy, and passable quality monitors. I couldn't test high-quality because I don't have one of those, though. Too expensive. (In reply to comment #4) > As far as I understand, the 16x16 icon is used in most browsers (in the > address > bar, on tabs, and for bookmarks), while 32x32 is used on the Windows 7 > taskbar, > some desktop icons, and 48x48 is used in Windows XP icons (some sites suggest > having a bigger favicon, too, but I'm not sure we want to do that just yet). Are the 48px ones worth including? If XP is the only thing that uses them it seems like a pretty specific use case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
