https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #5 from John Cupitt <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't know where you're getting this from. It either does im_shrink by a > precise floating point factor, giving the exact dimensions required, or it > does Sorry for the misinformation, I read VipsScaler too quickly. > I said on bug 25990 comment 9 that the reason we can't use vipsthumbnail is > because it stores the uncompressed source image on disk. It may be that this > is > no longer the case, however, using vipsthumbnail would still mean giving up > control over the sharpening parameters. vipsthumbnail no longer decompresses to disc, it streams the image. I agree that control over the sharpening would be useful, I'll add an option to let you specify the convolution matrix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
