https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48359
--- Comment #6 from Aaron Halfaker <[email protected]> --- Ahh I see. While you're right that the sha1 could be pulled in via a join with revision on the server side, given that most other fields in revision are copied in recentchanges, I'd suggest that copying one more and saving the cost of the join would maintain consistency and perform better. As far as generators go, it appears that they would not be useful for this type of "join". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
