https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
--- Comment #3 from Sam Reed (reedy) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Now that we have the list of eligible voters (bug 48168) let's set up a test > > run of the vote on test.wikipedia.org's SecurePoll so that Philippe and > > Risker > > can review. > > I'd really like to do this testing over the next few days, as it will allow > us > to determine the best way to set up the election, which this year is very > complex with three different types of roles being elected. Could we aim to > have this ready by end of day Friday May 17th please? http://bug-attachment.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=11425 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2013 Do we have all the relevant information to make up a config file for each election? Some of it's pretty self evident, but some could depend on the election. Can we just have the different votes as a separate question? Or do they need to be a separate polls? The titles and intros seem to go with the whole poll, not the question. As I'm writing this at 02:45 when I probably should have been already asleep, pretty much anyone can prepare the most of the config xml files as the information is public. Bar the ID numbers which I recall having to confirm were from the right starting point last time around. At the moment as I'm not familiar with the extension it's a mixture of reverse engineering the XML file/reading the code to see what's what. Beyond that it's the usual fallback of "ask Tim". With documentation being sort of limited to https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/SecurePoll -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
