https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42026

Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <bawolff...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bawolff...@gmail.com

--- Comment #7 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <bawolff...@gmail.com> ---

> 
> The possible options I see to accommodate these requests is to:
> a) Add a way to override the default 1 month limitation on
> [[Special:NewPage]]

There is an option (in the form of a wg variable). This restriction is related
to how long things are stored in recentchanges table. The default is actually 3
months. Wikimedia has it set lower. Some wikis (like translatewiki) have it set
to much higher.

> b) Add a checkbox on [[Special:Contributions]] to filter and return only the
> results with the N flag.

That's the same amount of expensiveness as the top only flag (Which can be
expensive for some queries, but we're already doing it). In fact its almost the
same query ( rev_parent_id = 0 vs rev_parent_id = page_latest ). My only
concern is that the form at the top of special:contribs is becoming a bit long.

> c) Add a new type of log that returns created pages that is filterable by
> user
> and namespace.

meh, less a fan of this idea. Making up old log entries would kind of suck.

> 
> I would think the order I have listed might be the same as easiest to hardest
> to do, but figured I would list them all.  I'm also working on a userscript
> fail all of these options to add this to the core there will still be a way
> to
> easily get this information as the toolserver unreliability has become to
> great
> for many users to bother with it.

I would recommend option B

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to