https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47415

--- Comment #9 from Legoktm <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> [Speaking with my "Product Manager for Admin Tools" hat on.]
> 
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Solving the "claim" auto patrol log problem, by disabling the logging for it
> > entirely seems an odd way to solve the problem.
> 
> I appreciate that this is disruptive for users of the patrolling logs, most
> notably the CVU tools, but this is a change made for site stability, and we
> must accept it.

Can we set up a "rolling" log instead? Like have the log entries vanish after
30 days (recentchanges table length). After that point you can't tell whether
the edit was patrolled or not, so it would be pointless to know who patrolled
it.

This has the advantage of not breaking anything (hopefully), and being able to
provide the necessary features that patrolling does, while still reducing the
log table.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to