https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
--- Comment #7 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > Which clearly shows that there isn't enough consensus for setting up a new > namespace. [Hence — changing the keyword back to 'shellpolicy'.] There are some objections on Meta-Wiki, but I don't think they hold weight. Some people think that other organization schemes might be better (categories + subcategories, subpages, etc.). But that seems like a personal preference kind of thing, so the person doing the work on this generally would be the one to decide how best to do it. At least in some ways. Namespaces exist as high-level content separation. For the most part, they're not exposed or even noticeable. In the few places where they are exposed, it would be nice to be able to scale better (drop-down menus and forms with checkboxes can become cumbersome). But the overall impact is low and for the most part they simply exist as folders (directories) on a wiki that can easily be ignored. I don't think this is really a policy issue, but we can leave the keyword for now. Sarah: if you want this namespace, someone will need to submit a changeset to Gerrit and it'll then have to be reviewed, merged, and deployed. The amount of time to actually add the namespace is a few minutes. It's the paperwork that can take a long time. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
