https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
--- Comment #10 from Ryan Lane <[email protected]> --- Anons are generally readers. Forcing anons to HTTPS would be to try to prevent eavesdropping. People who edit anon are giving up their privacy. If they wish to stay anonymous while editing they should make an account. Yes, there's still ways to eavesdrop when using HTTPS (like the example you've mentioned, but it's significantly harder and isn't completely accurate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
