https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49666
--- Comment #3 from James Forrester <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) > There is much discussion at bug 48429 about the need for both types of edit > links on every header. > > What might also work is an "edit" link (for VisualEditor) and an icon that > when > clicked will take one to the source editor for that section. The icon would > have a popup tooltip that says "edit source". It would show up when the mouse > cursor is run over the icon. My concern with this area is three fold: * "[edit] [edit source]" is a huge amount of extra chrome/clutter to enable for all users * "[edit]" going to one place unless you've got a preference in which case it goes to another is… confusing * "[edit]" OR "[edit source]" if you've got a preference is a bit messy, but not that bad I like "[edit ⚙]" more - what do you think? MatmaRex discussed this with me last night. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
