https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41745
--- Comment #34 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #32) > You probably included the block made by rollbackers on your counting, don't > you? Any local user would know that rollbackers can block and not only > admins. [...] Ah, thanks. That's a pretty big oversight. :) As I said, number of blocks is a rather useless piece of statistics and we should have more. > We are voting now [1] [...] It's very sad that you're voting out of emotions and incomplete data of the first two weeks of the last two months, without even considering alternatives like $wgRateLimits. (In reply to comment #33) > Are these numbers available somewhere? No. <https://pt.wikipedia.org/?diff=prev&oldid=36139702> The known numbers also contradict what Teles said, in particular reversion *seemed* to become quickier. > Is there some way to see that reverts have increased? If bug 46212 was fixed, communities would be less clueless. Platonides and I made a quick and dirty graph which I'm not going to publish as we're waiting for proper stats. In the meanwhile, as I said any proper discussion is impossible. Perhaps someone should try and run WikiStats on an own server until bug 42318 is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
