https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49860
--- Comment #65 from Teles <salvadore...@hotmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #64) > (In reply to comment #63) > > it should be said that they 'are' enough for we start > > thinking on it. > > This perfectly shows why pt.wiki had a CAPTCHA, now proven useless and > counter-productive, for 5 years: *of course* you can't know if something > works > before trying it. But if you refuse to think about solutions, quite naturally > solutions won't implement themselves. So, if nobody says it is 'not' enough we implement it? > You've not even tried to tell users that there's a problem with vandalism and > they need to help with patrolling... no wonder they don't. You really have no idea what you are saying. I don't even follow pt.wiki discussions to say that. I do that for years (example on a related discussion where that is exactly what I say: [1]). I always said we need more sysops, rollbackers, hugglers, patrollers or any kind of user willing to help with vandalism. That only proves your comments are false; just like this comment is false: "discussions on the matter on pt.wiki have never been active for more than a few consecutive days". One more time, I have to come here and say what is already obvious for pt.wiki users and defend me from a false accusation. It is obvious that we need more users and not only me but others say that too. But this way of trying to push a point of view is getting ridiculous and it is sad that you are starting to use false statements to defend your ideas. Readers should start being more careful when reading your comments. [1] - https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia:Esplanada/geral/Salebot_parado_(17mai2013)&diff=35793682&oldid=35792157 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
