https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50458
Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> --- Yes, I think the "wiki-specific workflows" is key. On wikis (including English Wikipedia) that use: <ref>{{some template|firstparam=a}}</ref> with a few key some templates, it's worth allowing a simplified flow for those (while still providing the full flexibility of arbitrary references and arbitrary templates where needed). Within a template, it's also verbose due to the screen layout. E.g. I would consider keeping parameter name and value on the same screen (for named parameters), and making it easy to add the next parameter without going up to the root. The latter can be done without the former. I'd recommend trying ProveIt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ProveIt_GT) on English Wikipedia if you haven't. I don't expect you to take the same approach we did (and don't look at the "parser"). The reference browsing part also probably doesn't apply, but the add mode in particular shows how the GUI can be streamlined when it doesn't attempt to be fully general. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
