https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40258

--- Comment #5 from Amir E. Aharoni <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Totally agree use of lrm rlm in MediaWiki but using unicode-bidi per
> http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/unicode-bidi is supported in IE.

IE support unicode-bidi: embed, but not unicode-bidi: isolate. To test, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Amire80/bidi-isolate

> "Internet
> Explorer for Windows versions up to and including 7 have some serious bugs
> relating to floated elements used in combination with the declarations
> direction: rtl; and unicode-bidi: embed;.". In fact I wanted a same this
> commit
> https://github.com/ebraminio/commafeed/commit/
> 315d5705ccb37ab71b418357587b2a14b9f7c3b4

I commented there.

> for MediaWiki. In fact using lrm and rlm and more buggier than using
> unicode-bidi: embed;
> I found this bug https://crbug.com/152650 on MediaWiki recent changes:
> 
> just paste this in Chrome url to see what is my problem:
> data:text/html;charset=utf-8,%D8%A8&rlm;.....%D8%A8
> compare it with: data:text/html;charset=utf-8,%D8%A8.....%D8%A8

Both of them display the same result in Chrome and in Firefox: Ba, five does,
Ba.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to