https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
John Broughton <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #10 from John Broughton <[email protected]> --- Should there be "not recommended" parameters (I'd suggest something like "for experts only" as a label; if something is "not recommended", why have it at all?) should be marked as such by a label, when listed as parameters that *could* be added. More generally, I don't think we need to worry much about really complex templates, if (as suggested elsewhere) the template dialog box includes a link to the documentation page for such templates. We don't need to worry much because only editors who are really interested - and motivated to understand the template - are likely to go beyond the parameters that are required and suggested, with the possible exception of editors who (idiosyncratically) use a less common parameter on a regular basis. In short, a "required" and a "suggested" list (AND enforcing that the "required" list be filled in) would be a huge win for the occasional user of templates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
