https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38010
--- Comment #9 from Amgine <amgine.sae...@gmail.com> --- Available options are ImageMagick, ImagickExt, sodipodi, inkscape, batik, rsvg, and imgserv. My understanding is: rsvg was the worst image quality, most difficult to install/maintain, but the best performance, and for this reason was selected and is currently used by WMF. So, the criteria would be: what is the ordered priorities to use in judging svg conversion (presumably 1. conversion performance, 2. maintenance cost, and 3. image quality); what are the ranked performances of the available options; if, after summing the performances of each option (weighted by ordered priority), rsvg is no longer the best choice, does WMF migrate to the better solution? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l