https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51757
James Forrester <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|Unprioritized |Lowest Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Summary|Visual Editor: clear |Visual Editor: Clear |formatting button should |formatting button should |not remove links |not remove links Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from James Forrester <[email protected]> --- This is exactly as designed. It also removes language settings (lang=fr and dir=rtl), superscript/subscript/underline/strikethrough/big/small/code formatting, and <span>s setting arbitrary formatting annotations (like "color: red;" or "font-family: serif;" or …). It's modelled against the same function in other editors, rendering the text down to completely plain text (except for objects like references or templates). Do you think each of these formatting options should have a "remove" function? Only some of them? Only those that trigger an inspector rather than just a boolean state (like links, language and arbitrary settings)? Only links? Why/why not? Happy to change direction but it would need to be a pretty strong reason to change (amongst other things, we'd need to give users ways to break out of the other kinds of pre-annotations as well as removing the selected annotation). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
