https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43449
--- Comment #15 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <[email protected]> --- I think monitoring should happen outside of the deamon (Since as you say, there's a limit to what we can do with an unreliable protocol). What I would suggest is some script (perhaps even living on the tools lab) that does the following: *Find the 10 most recent overwritten files. Get the thumbnail sizes that would be on the image description page, along with the original file asset (from both europe and north america varnish). Look at the age header. If the age header is longer than the time between last re-upload and now, yell. *Pick a test file at random. Request the file at some random size. Do ?action=purge. Sleep for about 10 seconds. Request the file again. Check to make sure that the age header is either not present or < 10. *For good measure. Pick a popular page like [[Wikipedia:Village pump (Technical)]] (also some redirect page like [[WP:VPT]]). Request the page. Check that the age header is less than the time between now and last edit. (Or at least for the redirect case, make sure that the difference isn't super big to give some lee-way for job queue) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
