https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
--- Comment #16 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Bots that modify existing articles to bypass bugs in Parsoid should be off > > the table as a solution. > > [[Hard cases make bad law]]. :-) > > As a general rule, Parsoid should be handle wikitext in the wild. However, we > need more information about the prevalence of these constructs on Wikimedia > wikis and the amount of work required to properly handle them before we can > make any real decisions here. Scott's Gerrit change #76626 seems to be a step > in the right direction. I'm more an adherent to the concept that rigorous adherence to fundamental principles always pays off in the long run, and "Parsoid should handle all wikitext currently in existence in English Wikipedia" strikes me as one of those fundamentals. I'm concerned by the existence of this one and its interplay with 50589. It appears that Parsoid and VE made some assumptions about how templates, wikimarkup, and tables would interact that aren't true. Take a look at the certification table in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Metallica_%28album%29&oldid=566196578&veaction=edit for example. There's something going on in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Certification_Table_Top or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Certification_Table_Entry that's causing more weirdness. I don't know if that's this one, 50589, or yet another related bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
