https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52232
--- Comment #7 from Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm fairly annoyed that I was told that VisualEditor "doesn't work the way > you > think it does" this morning and my patch sets were roundly and soundly > ignored > (in favor of Gerrit change #76516), only to have the exact changes > implemented a few hours later after this bug appeared. Your patchsets weren't ignored, we worked off them. At the time we honestly believed that this was unnecessary, and the code that uses them is written in a way that leads the reader to believe that it is unnecessary: if wmgVisualEditorDefault is false, wmgVisualEditorDisableForAnons is unused. However, caching threw a wrench in all of this. Two wrongs made a right, if you will. I'm sorry if we were dismissive earlier. When I said "VE doesn't work the way you think it does", what I meant to say was "despite the confusing way these variables are named, they mean something slightly different, such that one of them is unused if the other one is set a certain way". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
