https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51662

--- Comment #4 from Michael M. <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In my opinion adding such classes to ULS would entail quite a maintenance
> burden.

Somebody has to maintain the classes/templates/whatever, to keep them up to
date with the fonts provided by ULS. I don't see a reason why this maintenance
should be done by the single wiki communities. When you add, change or remove a
font from ULS, you have to update the central config files and automatically
re-build the others anyway, so why shouldn't there be a file with CSS
definitions like above which is updated along with these files?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to