https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50527

--- Comment #17 from [email protected] ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Chris, could you add a link to that comment. Im interested in why the nowiki
> edit filter isnt sufficient.

It isn't sufficient because it disappoints the first human involved, this
hypothetical new editor that is so confused by all of our existing material
that he's errantly typing wikitext into a source window. VE could *help* him,
but instead it pops a warning. The warning obviously isn't working, because we
see saves of this material happening constantly. He goes ahead and saves it
anyway, and he's bewildered and confused: he did just what the little cheat
sheet he got from a friend told him to do, and it didn't work.

It's insufficient because it requires a second human being to then review the
change, figure out what it was that the first human was actually attempting,
and then correct it if he can. 

It's insufficient because it's in support of a use-case that doesn't exist:
there's no reason to put something like [[New York City|the Big Apple]] into
articles. If there *were*, it's coming from an editor that is quite skilled
enough to go into the source editor. If we need to support putting such things
in using the visual editor, a workflow can be designed with a "nowiki" button
to do it intentionally.

Instead, James Forrester and Erik Moller have decreed that the bug not be
fixed, and that volunteers should eagerly flock to monitoring the output of an
edit filter that detects each and every time this happens to that these
volunteers can fix it. That's repulsive. That's a level of disregard for the
volunteers that work on this project that is breathtaking. It's the *reason*
that the VE team can fix dozens of bugs each hour and the Wikipedia community
still complains that they are non-responsive.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to