https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53541
--- Comment #20 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #18) > To be honest, I'm not convinced that the way this has been introduced > represents an improvement. > > 1) The extension itself clearly still needs UX love. The filter UI is already > cluttered, labels like "Users (Sep: |)" and confusing icon choices (magnify > icon to expand links) don't help. I agree with James' creation of bug 54203. However, I will call out what I see as a double standard here. When it's Meta-Wiki, code in an extension has you eager to pull in the reins; if this were the English Wikipedia, experimental or other one-off changes are _regularly_ deployed in extensions. Hell, the English Wikipedia basically has Wikimedia Foundation development teams devoted to this. Again, I agree that the extension needs work (or rather, Special:RecentChanges needs work). But I think it's also fair to hold CleanChanges to the same standards we hold other extensions to (security check, not out-of-sync with Wikimedia values, a clear enhancement request and/or backed by community consensus, etc.). And in my experience, increased exposure to something, particularly something incorrect or seemingly in need of improvement, increases the likelihood of improvements taking place (cf. [[Linus's Law]] and [[m:Cunningham's Law]]). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
